Being Gay and Elderly in Toronto

According to Peter Sprigg, author of Gay Marriage Questions, there atomic physique 18 two reasons a civil marriage should not be granted for soldiery couples. One is that since they argon descents and not marriages, they should not be granted. Sprigg enounces that in sanctify to deport a marriage, there must be a union of a serviceman and a woman, not a man and a man.Traditional intercourse cannot take pull with two hands involved. The sec one is that these type relationships are harmful. They do not provide the comparable(p) benefits as a marriage mingled with a man and a woman, and their consequences are far more negative than positive. (www.no fearlessmarriage. com/ transvesticmarriage uncertaintys. html) Either route, its looked at, correct with the evidence standing alone, it is sufficient to not accept the claim that gay couples should be able to legally link. The archetypical argument is that marriage is an mental hospital that predates the law and the Co nstitution. Marriage is sociological, not legal. Laws relating to marriage just acknowledge and play along in tact an institution that is already in existence. However, nigh large number believe that marriage is a way of recognizing couples who are in hit the hay with each other. With that being tell, they want to spend the rest of their lives together.Consider this. According to Sprigg, warmth and companionship were sufficient to define marriage, then there would be no reason to deny marriage to unions of a child and an freehanded, or an adult child and his senescence parent, or to roommates who construct no cozy relationship. intimately throng think that the sexual element is what defines a marriage. However, marriage is so much(prenominal) more than that. According to Webster, marriage is a mutual relationship in the midst of husband and wife the institution whereby men and women are conjugated in a special kind of neighborly and legal habituation for the purpose of founding and maintaining a family.Anthropologist female monarchsley Davis says that marriage is the unique trait of what is usually called marriage is social recognition and approvalof a couples engaging in sexual intercourse and succumbing and rearing children. The question was raised, are married couples without children certainly in a marriage? If gay couples are denied to marry, shouldnt straight couples without children be denied in any case? According to what Sprigg had to say concerning marriage and children, this would make sense, would it not? Not necessarily.If a couple wants children, and for some reason cannot have them, it is not their fault. A couple who decides not to have children whitethorn change their minds. At any rate, childless marriages are ease acknowledged because if not, it would be an invasion of a heterosexual couples privacy to acquire that they show intent to bear children, or the ability to have children. So, what is the real purpose of mar riage? Anthropologist Kingsley Davis says that a marriages purpose is to socially recognized and ap prove to engage in sexual intercourse and bear and rear children.Another marriage scholar, Maggie Gallagher says that marriage across societies is a public sexual union that creates kinship obligations and sharing of resources between men, women, and the children their sexual union may produce. The mere biological conception and induce of children are not enough to make sure that reproduction of a healthy and successful society. capital of Minnesota Nathanson, the transgender scholar says that there are at least fivesome functions that marriage servesthings that every culture must do in order to survive and thrive. They are 1. Foster the bonding between men and women 2.Foster the birth and rearing of children 3. Foster some form of healthy masculine identity 4. Foster the bonding between men and children 5. Foster the transformation of adolescents into sexually responsible adults Maggie Gallagher puts it more simply, saying that children need mothers and fathers and marriage is the most hardheaded way to get them for children. Actually, when you look at it, homosexuals already have the reclaim the right to marry just like anyone else. When applying for marriage licenses, the application does not ask for a souls sexual orientation. Now, the freedom of homosexuals to marry is another story.Their marriage, just as any marriage stipulates that any person is legally sanctioned from marrying a child, a close job relative, a person who is already married, or a person of the same sex. that because homosexuals have a desire to marry, does not make it right or legal anymore than the desires of other tiny (but less vocal ) minorities of Americans pretends them a right to pedophilic marriages, incestuous marriages, or polygamous marriages. whatsoever detect that prohibiting same sex marriages is just as discriminatory as interracial marriages. However, that is not valid thinking.The purpose of the law against interracial marriage was to protect the social system of racial segregation, not to protect the nature of marriage. Preserving racial whiteness was an unworthy goal, certainly not one of the fundamental purposes of marriage green to all human civilizations. One of the arguments against gays is the fact that deity is not blessed with that union. According to the Bible, Men should not be lovers of themselves and neither should women. If God said it, then, that settles it. Among all the sins mentioned in the Bible, perhaps none is more disgusting to God than that of homosexuality.God destroyed two cities in the plains of Jordan, called Sodom and Gomorrah, because their wickedness was great (Genesis 1310-13). The slope word, sodomy is a derivative of the word Sodom for the cities were full of the sins of sodomy. Now, with that in mind, how more ms are people arrested for sodomizing young children or sodomizing another man? If one ca n get arrested for sodomizing, then evidently, it would stand to reason, that homosexuality is not right Biblically or lawfully. God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. If a man lies with a phallic as he lies with a woman, both(prenominal) of them have committed an abomination.They shall surely be put to death and their blood shall be upon them. (Leviticus 2013). Homosexuality is not a disease that is contagious or a disease from birth. Homosexuality is a learned behavior, much like lying, stealing, fornication, etc. Those that learn and practice such must stop. 1 Corinthians 69 says, Do you not know that the unrighteous volition not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolater, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. The homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God. They must bring forth fruits worthy of repentance. Now , the purpose of this typography is to argue whether or not same sex marriages should take place in Toronto or anyplace else. Though the Bible or piety is not in question here, there is still the argument of whether gays should be legally married? The scripture clearly states, that this union should not be sanctioned. Consider this. It is not a sin for the color of ones skin to be white, red, yellow, or lack, and we shouldnt discriminate against another because of it. However, it is a sin to be a homosexual.It is not a matter of discrimination. It is a matter of right or wrong in the sight of almighty God. Some say homosexuals are born that way and cannot change. This is another military campaign of men trying to justify themselves while practicing homosexuality. Homosexuality is condemned from the beginning of time to the end. One of these days, we will have to stand onward God and give an account of what was we do to our bodies, smoking, homosexuality, illegal drugs, etc. In Nova-Scotia, two men were married, but they were told, that they could not receive communion, unless they were celibate.These two men, both 69 are now trying to make the decision whether to leave the Catholic church building because now, they must make a choice between their religion and their marriage. They were refused, because chew wafers are considered the body and blood of Christ. To Catholics, receiving communion is one of the faiths most sacred rituals. Additionally, they were told that their marriage was a public scandal. Many people wonder why defending marriages and defending the family require different views regarding same-sex unions. In other words, how can a homosexual marriage affect a heterosexual marriage?Well, homosexuals unions often have a more come up to impact on heterosexual marriages than we know. For instance, the Boston Globe reported June 29, 2003, that nigh 40 percent of the 5,700 homosexual couples who have entered into civil unions in Vermont have had a previous heterosexual marriage. Children are the ones who suffer the most of homosexual unions because these children grow up without a mother and a father. These children are withal products of heterosexual marriages that ended up in divorce or death. These children also face being ridiculed at school and among their peers.The question is will these children, after(prenominal) being exposed to homosexuality in the home, grow up to be gay, or does this help them to choose heterosexuality vs. homosexuality? How do the mothers of these children feel about their now gay ex-husband, having custody or visitation rights? Some would approve it, and some would not. In Toronto, June 30, 2006, (LifeSiteNews. com) The mainstream media brought to life the phantom of the gay ingredient theory7 in covering a Canadian reading on the agate line of homosexuality. Homosexuality influenced by biological factors, Canadian researcher says, proclaimed the CBC, the first to break the story.This study was regarding sexual orientation of men determined before birth. However, the study was most intriguing for what the mainstream media failed to cover. Namely that, if true, the study suggests that homosexuality is a congenital abnormality, and shares its origins with other disorders developed in the womb. (www. lifesite. net/ldn/2006/jun/06063003. html Westen, fast one Henry, 2006) Some researchers at Brock University in St. Catherines Ontario published a study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences entitled biological versus non biological older brothers and mens sexual orientation.The results of this study proved that same-sex sexual orientation is a result from having older brothers, even though the brothers may have not been raised together. To put it simpler, by way of explanation the researchers suggest that same sex relationships result from an immune chemical reaction of the mother to the male child in her womb. A theory of male homosexuality i s consistent with the present finding that paternal immune retort to succeeding male pregnancies, says the study.If in fact, this study is correct, then the link between the mothers immune reaction and the childs time to come sexual orientation would probably be some effect of maternal anti-male antibodies on the sexual differentiation of the brain. Dr. John Shea, medical advisor to bm Life Coalition, explained to LifeSiteNews. com that the study explains the significance of its findings suggesting that the immune response of the mothers body, damages the sexual differentiation of the brain of the male child in the womb, thus producing an abnormality in the fetus. In 1998, almost 3. 7 one thousand thousand Canadians were 65 years of age and older. Over the next fifteen years, this number is expected to grow to approximately 5. 9 million. However, it is impossible to tell how numerous sapphics and gay men live in Canada. However, the numbers of older gay adults are estimated be tween 296,000 and 370,000, and should incr4ase proportionately to the general older population of the hoidenish to between 471,000 and 590,000 people.(Newsletter of the mall for Applied kindly research Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Vol. no. 2/Fall/Winter, 2002). Gerontological research has begun to look at the issues pertaining to gay and lesbian seniors only in the late 1970s, and most of these studies in the area have not succeeded in the experience of gay aging from the viewpoint of women, ethnocultural minorities, low-income individuals, and chose not actively involved in the gay and lesbian communities. (Ibid, 2002)In summary, if all studies conducted on whether or not gay marriage should be sanctioned y the church in regard to marriage, the evidence shows and proves that homosexual couples, male or female should not be sanctioned because of the hobby reasons 1. An abomination in the eyesight of God 2. In these relationships, the marriage cannot be sanction ed because no union really took place. 3. Children, cannot be born of these marriages, unless they were brought in from a heterosexual marriage.One of the purposes of marriage is to have children. 4. Foster the bond between many women, and a list of other reasons mentioned above. References (www. nogaymarriage. com/gaymarriagequestions. html (Leviticus 2013, King James Version of Holy Bible) (www. lifesite. net/ldn/2006/jun/06063003. html Westen, John Henry, 2006) (Newsletter of the centre for Applied Social research Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Vol. no. 2/Fall/Winter, 2002).