Genetically Engineered Foods Essay

genetically engineered or genetically modified foods be foods that atomic number 18 simply the result of alteration in the trustworthy genes of an organism much(prenominal) as a plant or an animal in army to blot out a characteristic or trait of the original organism. Because this involves the transfer of genes, genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) argon also f faint outn as transgenic organisms (Robert Sacerich-GMO, transmittableally Modified solid foods and Conspiracy Theories). GE foods peck be contrasted with ingrained fertilizer foods which ar basically foods which undergo a non-synthetic method of processing in the beginning distribution to the public. This identification number holds immense global splendor because it is considered to be an resource to firmness of purpose the World hurt crisis by fork outing GE foods to countries with an brusque supply of food (Anup Shah GE Technologies forget function military personnel ache Jeffrey Heit, MD-Genetically Engineered Foods ).In this paper, the relative advantages and disadvantages of distributing GE foods to the public provide be observe and weighed. The notion of GE technology being the sole alternative to solving World longing will also be investigated along with the cyclorama of using perfect food instead of GE food. In the bind, Is GE food safe?, Anup Shah argues that although there is a disaster the use of GE foods backside be beneficial to the general public, it cannot be said that this will last forever. The importance of this dilemma is being measured by the circumstance that there is downrightly no scientific proof at the present moment to predict the effects of these crops in the foresee fit future, though we might know a great deal about their initial pull ins to health and industry. David C. lease agrees with this point of view and states that man has tampered with the very core of our food supply as part of the continuing quest to out-do God.He goes on to berate about the unpredictability of altering genes. Stating in an example that certain genes from a floundera fishhave been inserted into tomatoes in golf-club to impart them a longer shelf life and that splicing genetic segments of one and only(a) species into the genes of another could never occur naturally, he goes on to measure the importance of this leave by comparing data from original research give-up the ghost that had been carried out to determine the relative advantages of golden strain and soybeans compared to the regular varieties acquirable in the market (David C. Pack -Genetically Engineered Foods wherefore the Controversy?). Jeffrey Heit, MD, in Genetically Engineered Foods confirms that that the use of GE foods might entail a cheap and cost-effective industrialsystem but the public might not benefit from it the vogue we think it will.For instance, the use of peanut genes in tomatoes might adversely affect people allergic to peanuts and tomatoes being irrep laceable ingredients in roughly all kinds of curry based foods aggravate the situation. On the other hand, somewhat authors manage Amy Norton argue that Vitamin A deficiency can cause sightlessness and, because it dampens immune system function, leaves children more vulnerable to becoming severely ill from infections. If all children in deprived areas were given enough vitamin A, up to 2.7 million deaths could be pr circumstanceed each year according to statistics. Genetically engineered space capsules rich in vitamin A could be provided to the children in the aforementioned deprived areas. UNICEF has a political program to give young children vitamin A capsules twice a year (one capsule is corking for a six-month supply of the vitamin).A range of foods naturally check vitamin A or vitamin A precursors from liver, fish oil and eggs to spinach, carrots, mango tree and red peppers. But again, those foods may either be locally unavailable, take care on season, or be priced beyond what most families in ripening nations can afford (Amy Norton- Genetically modified rice a good vitamin A source 14 Janice Jones- Advantages & Disadvantages of Organic Foods). In another bind the author, Bryan Walsh negotiation about the relationship between humane eggs and the expressive style the laying hens are brought up or bred. He hints at the possibility of there being something worse than genetic engineering at hand, which is the way animals are brought up in farms, more specifically chickens. so, if such a relationship exists then there seem to be more atmospheric pressure matters at hand than just the apparent side-effects of GE foods (Bryan Walsh-Vital Farms Raising the Ultra-Organic junky).Christie Wilcox adopts a different approach by targeting some of the myths held by people in favor of organic farming as opposed to genetically engineered farming. She talks about how pesticides are used abundantly in organic farming, how organic food is not healthier tha n GE food and how it is not rarefied for the environment ideas that are common amongst the general public about organic food (Christie Wilcox Myth busting 101 Organic Farming Conventional Agriculture). endorse up the aspect that genetically engineered foods are unsafe and should not be distributed to the general public since their after effects have not only been discovered, Anup Shah states in an article how manwide polls indicate a extravagantly public demand of articulateing GE food so as to change the public to choose their preference of food.She points out that any failure to do so implies that the public is ignorant. Is it justified to keep the public in the grungy just because we think the public is too ignorant to grasp the significance of GE food? On the other hand, is it okay to not label food as genetically engineered or not genetically engineered because of the growing apprehension that there will be competition between GE based and non GE based food companies? ( Anup Shah- Public Concerns and Protests on GE Food). While some believe that genetically engineered foods are generally regarded as safe. There has been no adequate testing, however, to ensure complete safety. There are no reports of illness or injury due to genetically engineered foods (Jeffrey Heit, MD- Genetically engineered foods). On the very other end, some people believe that genetically engineered technology is our only hope in abating the ongoing World Hunger problem. However, some people disagree.The idea that genetically engineered technologies can solve gentlemans gentleman hunger is unreliable. It might have the potential to abet the evolution nations in fighting the food crisis but it is amongst the many other alternatives present. A significant number of people in the third world countries are unable to get food because it is expensive, not because it is unavailable. As we can see, the issue of a countrys economy is closely tied with the world hunger problem in t his case (Anup Shah- GE Technologies will solve world hunger). There are various questions we necessity to ask ourselves if we indispensableness to determine the safety GE food to human beings. In the event that this technology achieves its current aim, who will benefit more, people in need or the people who need more? If we are not able to predict the potential side effects of genetically engineered food, is it safe to missy this one chance to revert poverty or even world hunger for that matter?If not, then will not taking the chute be worth it in the long run? One understanding why GE technology is being given the go-ahead is that there is a lot of money and profit involved in this. Hence from a business spatial relation it is more favorable, for example to produce crops that can be resistant to your pesticides (so that you can apply more of them). Keeping this perspective in mind, is it moral to jeopardize the prospect of hunger free countries? Does the bearing man tamperi ng with nature also apply to scenarios in which Genetic engineering has helped the human race develop the food market? (David C. Pack-GeneticallyEngineered Foods why the Controversy? David C. Pack)The author mentions how the cross breeding of seeds needs to be prevented so as to prevent any food anomalies in the industry. Considering how different animals like cows and buffaloes are cross-bred, how justified is it to combine and merge the habits of different animals who are otherwise different in various aspects? Whereas the problem of World Hunger is concerned, if it cannot be solved by GE crops and is linked to poverty instead, will the eradication of poverty solve the predicament of world hunger?If hunger is an effect of poverty where poverty is a political and economic issue then politics influences how it is produced who it is produced by and for what purposes it is produced. David C. Pack would also agree eve the problem of world hunger cannot be solved using this technology since the yield of GM crops is even lesser than that of natural (regular) crops (David C. Pack -Genetically Engineered Foods Why the Controversy?). In conclusion, nothing can be said with absolute certainty about the pros and cons of using this kind of technology but what can be done in this field is research in order to determine the magnitude of change it is capable of delivering in the long run.ReferencesAlexandra Sifferlin -California fails to street genetically modified foods labeling initiative http//healthland.time.com/2012/11/07/california-fails-to-pass-gm-foods-labeling-initiative/ Amy Norton Genetically modified rice a good vitamin A source http//www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_128308.html Anup Shah -Is GE Food Safe?http//www.globalissues.org/article/189/is-ge-food-safeAnup Shah -GE Technologies will solve world hunger http//www.globalissues.org/article/190/ge-technologies-will-solve-world-hunger Anup Shah -Public Concerns and Protests on GE Foodhttp//www.globa lissues.org/article/196/a-huge-wave-of-public-concern Bryan Walsh -Vital Farms Raising the Ultra-Organic Egg http//science.time.com/2012/10/22/vital-farms-raising-the-ultra-organic-egg/