Expeditions to Antarctica and Annapurna Essay -- Comparison, Shackleto

When taking a quick liveliness at the cardinal expeditions, one direct by Ernest Shackleton to Antarctica and the different light-emitting diode by Arlene Blum to rise Annapurna, a quick summation can be made that Blum succeeded in her expedition and Shackleton failed. But this is a shallow view, not considering the nuances and actual experiences of the trips. Ernest Shackleton specialise out with his crew in 1915 to be the showtime expedition to traverse Antarctica, but in fact, he never knack foot on the continent. While failing at his initial goal, he was a super successful leader and kept his 28 s old(a)ierypower safe for ending to two years, while they were trap on the methamphetamine floe and whence, after(prenominal) the ice gave way, when they were paddling hundreds of miles across open seas in small, wooden lifeboats. He then completed the t rack uperous journey across second Georgia Island to reach a town and resources necessary to rescue his other man power. All of his men were rescued alive and safe and all were open to return spot to their families. In comparison, Arlene Blum set out from the United States in 1978 with 9 of her teammates as the American Womens Himalayan Expedition the first all-woman multitude to attempt to procession Annapurna. Though their expedition was alike often hazardous, it didnt have the aforementioned(prenominal) level of urgency, because at any point during their climb, the sort out was at autonomy to descend. Blum struggled with her role as the leader of this group of highly independent women. She too often hesitated and showed her lack of confidence, which in turn led to many problems inside the group and with the hired Sherpas. On October 15th, 1978, two members of the expedition, along with two Sherpas, reached the treetop of Annapurna, fulfilling the goal of the group. However, two days later, on Octobe... ...ew to the street of being trapped by the ice, he excelled at his deci sion making. He didnt swear that one should look back at recent mistakes and waste eon on regrets, indeed, Shackleton never wasted time or energy lament things that had passed or that he couldnt change (Morell, pp. 145). As Shackleton himself said, A man must shape himself to a immature scrawl directly the old one goes to ground (Morell, pp. 145). This ability to shift apace and react to new circumstances served him and his crew members well and allowed all of them to barely themselves from their icy trap. As Dennis Perkins says in his book, Leading at the Edge, in rootage to the last leg of Shackletons expedition, Their heroic journey across southeasterly Georgia Island had save their shipmates. It remains a tribute to unremitting groundsand to the tenacious creative thinking at The Edge (pp. 148). Expeditions to Antarctica and Annapurna Essay -- Comparison, ShackletoWhen taking a quick look at the two expeditions, one led by Ernest Shackleton to A ntarctica and the other led by Arlene Blum to climb Annapurna, a quick summation can be made that Blum succeeded in her expedition and Shackleton failed. But this is a shallow view, not considering the nuances and actual experiences of the trips. Ernest Shackleton set out with his crew in 1915 to be the first expedition to cross Antarctica, but in fact, he never set foot on the continent. While failing at his initial goal, he was a highly successful leader and kept his 28 men safe for close to two years, while they were trapped on the ice floe and then, after the ice gave way, when they were paddling hundreds of miles across open seas in small, wooden lifeboats. He then completed the treacherous journey across South Georgia Island to reach a town and resources necessary to rescue his other men. All of his men were rescued alive and safe and all were able to return home to their families. In comparison, Arlene Blum set out from the United States in 1978 with 9 of her teammates as the American Womens Himalayan Expedition the first all-woman group to attempt to climb Annapurna. Though their expedition was too often hazardous, it didnt have the same level of urgency, because at any point during their climb, the group was at liberty to descend. Blum struggled with her role as the leader of this group of highly independent women. She too often hesitated and showed her lack of confidence, which in turn led to many problems within the group and with the hired Sherpas. On October 15th, 1978, two members of the expedition, along with two Sherpas, reached the summit of Annapurna, fulfilling the goal of the group. However, two days later, on Octobe... ...ew to the path of being trapped by the ice, he excelled at his decision making. He didnt believe that one should look back at past mistakes and waste time on regrets, indeed, Shackleton never wasted time or energy lamenting things that had passed or that he couldnt change (Morell, pp. 145). As Shackleton him self said, A man must shape himself to a new mark directly the old one goes to ground (Morell, pp. 145). This ability to shift quickly and react to new circumstances served him and his crew members well and allowed all of them to save themselves from their icy trap. As Dennis Perkins says in his book, Leading at the Edge, in reference to the last leg of Shackletons expedition, Their heroic journey across South Georgia Island had saved their shipmates. It remains a tribute to unremitting effortand to the tenacious creativity at The Edge (pp. 148).